Shut Up, Sit Down

  • Welcome!

    I am Anji, radical feminist and mama extraordinaire. I just moved here from Blogger so I'm still settling in. Pull up a cushion and come talk feminism with me.



  • Blog Flux Directory
    Join My Community at MyBloglog!

    Search the web and raise money for charity

    Zimbabwean women want Dignity.Period!

  • Other Stuff

    Orion - me, blogging about my son.
    deviantART - my art and writing.
    LibraryThing - my bookshelf catalogue.
  • Categories

  • Subscribe

  • Recent Favourites

  • Flickr Photos

    Distracted

    Matching

    Houses of Parliament

    Women Not Sex Objects

    Object Banner

    More Photos
  • Meta

  • hit tracker

Campaign against the reduction of the abortion ‘time limit’.

Posted by Anji on Sunday 11th May 2008

With the key vote on the abortion time limit on Tuesday 20th May it is urgent that MPs hear from you.

Go to Abortion Rights for information on how you can find out who your MP is and his or her contact details, plus a model letter for you to use or edit to your own preference.

Not sure why you should bother? Read Penny Red’s 24 Reasons for 24 Weeks for some absolutely excellent arguments against reducing the abortion time limit.

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Squee!

Posted by Anji on Sunday 4th May 2008

My article about the recent launch of Object’s lap dancing campaign was posted at The F-Word today. I had an awesome time there so you should really go and read about it. The photographs are here too. Go go go!

Posted in activism, blogosphere, feminists, government, petition, politics | 2 Comments »

Archive of the Biting Beaver

Posted by Anji on Saturday 26th April 2008

I had an archive of Biting Beaver’s posts saved by my Google Reader, and sent them off yesterday to One Angry Girl for the new blog she has created, Archive of the Biting Beaver. It’s a great project and she’s managed to get all the entries I sent up there already, so if like me you’ve been missing BB, go and take a look! :D

Posted in blogosphere, feminists | 2 Comments »

Thirteenth Carnival of Radical Feminists

Posted by Anji on Sunday 20th April 2008

Hi there and welcome to Shut Up, Sit Down! I’m Anji, British radical feminist, single mum and bookworm, and I’m really excited and proud to be hosting the thirteenth Carnival of Radical Feminists! There have been some cracking submissions which I’ve thoroughly enjoyed so I’m really eager to share them with you. I wish I had been able to write more interesting and worthy introductions - I shouldn’t make excuses but I will say I have mental health problems and a toddler son, so the week between the submission deadline and now has been rather hectic! I’ve been working on this every evening after the wee man went to bed, and my best friend is very kindly watching him for an hour or so right now so I can finish off and get this posted. So - make yourself a cuppa, kick off those shoes and settle down for the Carnival!

The first submission I got for the carnival made me giggle, so I figured it was a good thing to kick off with. Madeleine Begun Kane presents Ode To Eliot Spitzer posted at Mad Kane’s Political Madness. At the same blog, and in the same vein, An Ode To Lefty Bloggers Who Hate Hillary Clinton and Ode To Randi “Queen of Obscene” Rhodes, both of which should raise a giggle and have you nodding your head in agreement.

Next, Nine Deuce presents I don’t give a shit about chocolate at all. posted at Rage Against the Man-chine. I loved this post as soon as I read it, and I was really happy to see it submitted for the carnival. I feel like she took my feelings about food and wrote them down a million times more eloquently than I could ever hope to. One of the biggest truths I have read recently: “There is nothing immoral about eating something that tastes good, even if it does become apparent that you’ve done so after the fact. There is nothing ethically unsound about nachos (they make vegan ones, you know). What’s ethically objectionable is harming your health and removing all the joy from your life in order to increase the number of Coors Light drinkers who want to pork you. Feel guilty about eating meat, or buying gas, or listening to house music, or liking Family Guy, but eat the goddamned cake and tell the world you aren’t signing up for the starvation plan.”

Lori Jewett gives a passionate description of why she believes Senator Clinton should be US president in Coming Together for Change posted at Between Us Girls.

Being in the UK, the concept of ‘crisis pregnancy centres’ is not one I come across in my day-to-day life. However it drives me batty that they are allowed to exist in the USA, even more so that they are allowed to lie. So I very much enjoyed Holly Ord’s Crisis Pregnancy Centers Having to Tell People They Lie? Hells Yes! posted at Menstrual Poetry.

Heart shows us Global Day For Darfur at Modern Musings, a collection of “all the conscious bloggers who have expended their time and effort to educate, motivate and activate for our Darfurian family.”

One of the things I feel really strongly about here in the UK is stem cell research and the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill. Cruella clearly agrees, and makes a wonderful argument in favour of the Bill in Before I Forget. Says Cruella: “I propose that the atheist scientists get on with the research and if the Catholic Alzheimer’s sufferers of the future prefer not to use the resulting treatments on principle - fine.” You can’t say fairer than that.

Kitty Glendower writes an excellent article about women taking on men’s behaviours and the current trend of ‘girlfight’ videos. Heart shows us Raunch Culture Is Reaching Fruition At The Expense of Women at A Room Of Our Own. “Nevertheless, my first thought when I read yet again how young girls are beating up other girls in order to make videos for the Internet, was, how the behaviors that are more open for appropriation are the ones that do not favorably benefit women.”

By now I think the entire world, or at least the feminist blogging world and the parenting blogging world (the only two I inhabit) has heard of the abomination that is the online game Miss Bimbo. Nine Deuce writes a wonderfully scathing criticism of the game and the messages it is sending young girls (its target audience) in You’re never too young for implants posted at Rage Against the Man-chine.

Hollaback Australia appears to be pretty new. It takes the idea presented by Hollaback NYC of empowerment through the photographing of street harrassers with your mobile phone and subsequently publicising them on the blog, and offers it to the women of Australia. Lauredhel shows us “Back Off!”: Why Holla Back Works.

One of the ‘big issues’ at the moment is the way in which prostitution should be tackled. Lauredhel presents Prostitution: regulation, exploitation and death posted at Hoyden About Town, which provides an excellent and well-researched argument against legalisation and reasonings for the introduction of the ‘Swedish model’ of tackling prostitution. As Tigtog quotes from a comparison between Sweden (the Swedish model) and Holland (where prostitution is legalised), “the bottom line is that if you want to rape a 13-year-old girl imported from Eastern Europe, you’ll have a much easier time in Amsterdam than in Stockholm.”

Allecto gives us a great deconstruction of Joss Whedon’s Firefly, and how it really isn’t so ‘feminist’ and ‘empowerful’ as he and his fans would like to have us believe. Heart shows us A Rapist’s View of the World: Our Mrs. Reynolds: Part One at Gorgon Poisons. “Mal the captain of the ship finds out that he has married a woman when he finds a stowaway on his ship. The stowaway, whose name is Saffron, was traded to Mal as a gift because he helped the inhabitants of a planet to get rid of some bad guys. The most disturbing reading of this particular episode is as an endorsement of male terrorism in the home.”

Holly Ord has much admiration for Angela Shelton, and for good reason. She is, in Holly’s words, “a motivating and inspiring woman to countless survivors. On a personal level, after watching her documentary and after some time reading up on her and getting involved myself with activism efforts to raise awareness about sexual abuse, she had given me the motivation to speak up about my own abuse in early 2007.” She presents an article about Shelton and a recommendation of her film with Watch Searching for Angela Shelton - For Free!, and gives a review of her book in Finding Angela Shelton, both at Menstrual Poetry.

As a parent, a feminist and a happy fat woman I was pretty outraged by the publication of the new book “My Beautiful Mommy”, written to explain cosmetic surgery to kids. So this article, presented by Heart, warmed my cockles. “So here’s the deal, kids: Mom gained a few pounds and stretchmarks giving birth to you. Yes you, and in a world where size 0 is the new size 6, that means that every day Mommy is subjected to a gazillion messages telling her that her body is no longer beautiful. Therefore, Mommy is going to subject herself to major surgery in order to feel good about herself again but really it is no big deal, getting a new belly is just like getting a new dress or new lipstick except you get a big bandage…” Check out Mommy Gets A Tummy Tuck–Sure To Be A Children’s Classic at Feminist Peace Network.

I recently read Naomi Wolf’s The Beauty Myth, and then Debs submitted Judging Women’s Choices, posted at Littoral Mermaid, which says much the same thing as Wolf’s book but in one concise blog post. Having also recently blogged about body hair, the first chapter about hair removal also cheered me greatly: “The beauty industry judges women’s choices. Obviously, it - and its billions of dollars and outlets - puts out an image of idealized femininity. Idealized femininity means removing body hair. Having body hair… is unfeminine and absolutely unacceptable. Since the only beautiful women in the widely available mainstream magazines have no visible body hair, the message is obviously that hair removal is a good thing and will make women beautiful.” Well said, and the rest of the post is no different - I thoroughly recommend it.

Why do so many men seek out prostitutes? Holly Ord gives an explanation of society and what men feel is expected of them while also battling selfish desires and sexual needs with The Psychology Behind Men and Prostitutes posted at Menstrual Poetry.

Heart presents The Swarming Offense from Black Women Vote. “We must understand that the movement to demonize black women was NOT a random, accidental decision. Black women are maligned on BET for the same reasons that we said that the atrocities in the Congo happen: 1) Greed. 2) Hatred of women, or lack of empathy for women outside of your immediate family. 3) Impugnity. 4) Poverty of women. 5) Lack of education or miseducation of women , and lack of education or miseducation of the men in their direct proximity. We must understand that acts of racism and sexism are not simple, meaningless, homogenous lumps of hate. They are complex systems comprised of extreme self interest - and can be destroyed by removing the rewarding effects of it, and by replacing those rewards with penalties that trigger that same self interest to cause them to change direction.”

Marcella Chester says “Most of the common safety advice for women depends upon victim blaming. Here is advice which focuses on the behavior of rapists and could-be rapists.” as she presents Advice For Rape Survivors: Personal Safety posted at abyss2hope. One line above all stood out to me: “Making sexual decisions for someone else is rape.” So simple, yet so difficult for so many people to understand.

Holly Ord is bemused by reports that men today are feeling ‘emasculated’. “You would think that with men feeling the way they apparently do, they would begin to see what women have gone through to get where they stand today and that they would understand and appreciate the activism and determination in which we have fought for our rights and have a better understanding of equal rights. However, men believe that they are deserving of all power in all aspects of life and in society based purely on their possession of a penis.” Read her outstanding criticism of these ideas at The World is Now Dominated by Women, Where Have I Been? posted at Menstrual Poetry.

Another scathing rant, this time against the beauty and pornography industries, from Nine Deuce with There is NO REASON to bleach your butthole posted at Rage Against the Man-chine. Her rage is contagious: “The fucking ARROGANCE of these motherfuckers expecting women to not only let their bodies be used like objects, but to endanger their own health to make the experience more aesthetically pleasing to the person doing the using makes me so fucking angry that I want to start a nu metal band or something (OK, I can’t get that angry).” And she even manages to raise the occasional smile. Great stuff.

And that’s all, folks! Thanks to everyone who submitted posts, and to all the wonderful women who wrote them. The next Carnival will be on Monday 19th May at Maggie’s Metawatershed. Click here to submit a post (your own or someone else’s) - deadline for submissions is Monday 12th May. You can also check below for the previous carnivals if you’ve missed any.

Previous Carnivals Of Radical Feminists

01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12

Posted in blogosphere, carnival, feminists, roundups | 17 Comments »

Trouble and Strife

Posted by Anji on Thursday 17th April 2008

I’m all excited, because the postie’s been! He brought my Bin The Bunny t-shirt (go here to get your own and support the Radical Feminist Summer Gathering in the process), a copy of Emmeline Pankhurst’s “Freedom or Death” speech, The Demon Lover by Robin Morgan, and most excitingly of all, the first three issues of Trouble and Strife magazine! :D

Trouble and Strife was a radical feminist journal/magazine which started in 1983 and apparently ceased publishing around 2001. I have managed to get the first three issues; Winter 1983, Spring 1984 and Summer 1984. These magazines are older than I am!

I will hopefully be making them available in the South Coast Feminists Library. The Library is just a little collection of books, documentaries, films, magazines and memorabilia which are of interest to feminists, partly because we want the books to be available for members who would not otherwise be able to buy them, and partly as a group education tool. So any ideas for things to go in there would be great.

I’m off to hide from my son now so I can try to leaf through my new pieces of history. :D

Posted in feminists, personal, scf | 2 Comments »

The Radical Feminist Summer Gathering 2008

Posted by Anji on Tuesday 15th April 2008

In Manchester on Saturday 26th July Radical Feminist Sisters will be hosting the first annual Radical Feminist Summer Gathering. Debs and many other women are working their socks off to make sure the gathering is a success, and you, radical feminist women, are all invited!

There are more details about the event on the Radical Feminist Summer Gathering homepage, along with space for suggestions, volunteers etc. If you would like to attend, please follow the instructions on the homepage.

We are also raising funds for the event by selling anti-Playboy Bin the Bunny t-shirts. Each t-shirt costs 12 pounds, of which 7 pounds will go towards the gathering. So, you get to raise money for a great event, and tell Heff where to stick it at the same time! Please see the site for more details.

Do have a look at the homepage for the Gathering, and spread the word!

Copy the code from the box below to use the lovely little advert/sticker Debs made. Don’t worry about hotlinking as I have lots of unused bandwidth, so steal away! :D

Posted in blogosphere, feminists | 1 Comment »

The Politics of Body Hair

Posted by Anji on Monday 7th April 2008

I’ve just finished reading Naomi Wolf’s The Beauty Myth, a fascinating and thought-provoking book. I thoroughly recommend it to all; it was well-written and accessible to everyone, regardless of whether you consider yourself a feminist I believe you would still really gain something from reading it. There was an important issue Wolf neglected to cover though, and I was sad not to see its inclusion, because I feel it is as intrinsic a part of the beauty myth as body fat, ageing, clothing or cosmetic surgery. The issue is body hair, and for me it is as political an issue as it is personal,and the part it plays in the subjugation of women through the beauty myth is just as important.

As women are taught that ‘beautiful’ means fitting within a certain body shape and type, with clear skin devoid of lines and soft, shiny hair on our heads, so we are also told that ‘beautiful’ means being hairless on our bodies. Hair on the head and eyebrows is permissible (so long as it is plucked, coloured and trimmed to a standard deemed acceptable to society). Any other bodily hair is impermissible, unacceptable, ‘ugly’. This hair must be stripped through plucking, shaving, waxing or even more painful procedures like electrolysis, from the entire body. The upper lip, chin, armpits, pubic mound, vulva, legs - even toes, belly and chest must be one hundred per cent ’smooth’ and hair-free. The hair on our heads must be our ‘crowning glory’; the rest of our bodies must be as bald as a newborn.

Much of this can be attributed to the fetishisation of youth. Like glossy hair, bright eyes and unlined skin, hairlessness gives the body the appearance and feel of a young girl’s, or what I once saw described on the website of a hair removal product as a ‘prepubescent appeal’. It is curious that in a society where paedophilia is so reviled and such a huge problem, it is thought of as harmless and ordinary that men live out their paraphilic fantasies by requiring that the women they are exposed to look as young as possible. Pornographic media advertises its ‘barely legal teens’. Actresses are routinely referred to as ‘girls’ rather than women. The image of the ’sexy school girl’ is accepted and even desired, not just in pornography but in advertising, music video and themed nightclubs. Women slather on creams and apply blusher to their cheeks in order to attain a more ‘youthful’ appearance. Cosmetic surgeons and expensive underwear promise to give the illusion of the ‘firm’, ‘pert’ and ‘perky’ breasts which generally only occur naturally in adolescent girls. Most curiously of all, women are required to remove the most visible, prominent physical sign that they have entered adulthood - their bodily hair.

I once spoke with a woman on this very subject - her male partner had expressed his distaste for her pubic hair. It looked messy, he had said, it was unhygienic and he ‘just preferred’ the look of a woman’s genitals shaved (a preference borne, no doubt, from the normalisation of baldness in both pornography and ‘mainstream’ media). “I don’t get it,” she wondered, bemused. “Why on earth would he want to feel like he was having sex with a little girl rather than the grown woman I am?”

Grown women are, after all, meant to have hair on their armpits, vulva and legs. There is nothing ‘unnatural’ about a hairy woman; if there were then the hair would not grow there in the first place. Likewise, there is nothing ‘unfeminine’ about a hairy woman; if femininity is defined as ‘like a woman’ then a woman in her natural state is by definition as feminine as she can be. Indeed, one could say it is the hairless woman who is ‘less feminine’, as she removes parts of her natural, womanly body.

So why the revulsion upon seeing a woman’s furry armpit or catching a glimpse of her leg hair? Why are these same features on a man not also seen as unhygienic or disgusting? Partly because of what has already been discussed here - the fetishisation of youth in women. A man, upon the appearance of grey hair and creased skin, is not considered to be ‘past his prime’, instead he is seen as ‘mature’, ‘distinguished’. A woman, taught throughout her life that beauty through youth is her ultimate goal and that upon ageing her beauty dies, may feel compelled to remove every trace of adulthood within her control - and hair removal is so easy, so readily available, and she is so socialised to believe it is normal, that she reaches for the razor.

It is also, and perhaps more worryingly, another prominent way in which the beauty myth keeps women in their place. As fear of being fat keeps us self-loathing and self-starving, and fear of age keeps our self-esteem in check, keeps us preoccupied with ‘caring’ for our skin with expensive products that do not work, so fear of body hair keeps us worrying about our appearance rather than the multitude of more important issues we could be concerning ourselves with. We are kept busy and overtired, given a list of things we must do and not do to attempt to reach that impossible dream of ‘beauty’ and therefore be acceptable to society. For if women were one hundred per cent comfortable in our bodies without expending all this time, money and effort in pursuit of the beauty myth our new power, energy and self-esteem would make things very difficult indeed for the current patriarchal status quo.

“No woman is free until every woman is free.” Along the same lines as this truth lies the truth that no woman really removes hair purely for her own pleasure as long as there is still an obligation for women as a whole to be hairless. There is no real truth in the sentence “I shave because I like it,” when that preference is borne solely of social conditioning. So many women feel they ‘must’ shave if they are going to wear a skirt or a sleeveless top. So many women feel they ‘must’ shave before swimming or a gynaecological exam or a sexual encounter. So many women stop shaving in the winter or when they are single or at any other time when they are sure that no other person will see the hair. If they really are removing the hair purely for themselves, why should any of these exceptions apply? The reality is that if these women existed in a society where the beauty myth and the Male Gaze were nonexistent, where body hair was accepted and even celebrated, very few would continue to waste time with hair removal.

What about hair removal in men? No conversation on this subject is complete without someone piping up with “But what about men? They have to shave their faces - isn’t that equally as unfair?” No. It’s not. Men have a wide range of acceptable choices of styles for the hair on their faces just as they do for the hair on their heads. They can shave it all off, grow it all, grow a goatee, grow a moustache, style it and trim it and wax it, and still fall within the boundaries of ’socially acceptable’. People do not look with repulsion at a man’s beard as they do at a woman’s leg hair. Women are given only one choice deemed ‘acceptable’ - hairlessness. If women as standard grew hair on our cheeks and chins, we would not be given the same options with it as men are (i.e. it being socially acceptable to remove it, grow it or anything in between), we would be compelled to remove it all - the same double standard which currently applies to the hair on the rest of our bodies when compared with that on men’s bodies.

So body hair, then, is political, and very much a part of the myth of beauty which pervades society. It is also personal; our decision as women to unnecessarily remove body hair or to leave it where nature intended is ruled by how much we mind going against the social norm and just how much we care about changing the patriarchal status quo. It has been said in certain feminist circles that body hair is a trivial issue, that there are bigger battles to fight. But I believe it to be an important and valid concern - that of women’s self-esteem and lack thereof, of the way women’s bodies are seen as public property and the way we adjust them so that they will be accepted. It is important because society cannot stand to see a woman’s body in its natural state, much less can it stand to see a woman who feels comfortable, powerful and confident in her body in its natural state. It is about the way women are perceived and the way we are ridiculed and looked down upon as substandard simply for refusing to participate in needless rituals for the sake of fitting in.

So what can be done? The first thing is for you, dear reader, to put down the razor and truly and honestly examine your ‘beauty’ rituals. When Julia Roberts exposed a hairy armpit, dissenting voices said, “Maybe she didn’t forget to shave, maybe she just had more important things to do!” Don’t you have more important things to do? Put the razor down, cancel that waxing session and let the hair on your body grow where nature intended it to. If you’re uncomfortable with the idea at first, think of it as a social experiment. Be proud of your body for looking like a real woman’s body and not the facsimile of a child’s. If people mention your hair (and I can tell you from experience that it happens a lot less than you might expect) take the opportunity to educate, to remind them that this is how an adult woman’s body is supposed to look, to ask them how often they comment on the body hair of men.

Take the opportunity to make a stand without having to do any work at all. Take the opportunity to give your poor skin a rest from the constant barrage of scraping and plucking and pulling. Refuse to conform to a ridiculous and sexist beauty double standard from which you gain absolutely nothing. Refuse to hate your body and refuse to let others hate your body - and if they do, refuse to care. I stopped shaving when I had the lightbulb moment: the realisation that I really didn’t have to. I learned to treasure my body hair like every other aspect of my womanhood, and now you couldn’t pay me enough to shave it off. Every woman I know who has resisted the hairlessness propaganda and quit shaving has felt the same way - comfortable, liberated, having taken one step further to free themselves from the misogynistic standards of ‘beauty’.

Put down the damned razor and love your body the way it is naturally, not the way you’ve been taught it ought to be. By refusing to participate personally, but becoming one more woman who challenges the status quo by loving her body hair, you become one more soldier in the army fighting towards making women’s bodily self-esteem and equality a reality.

Posted in beauty myth, body hair | 23 Comments »

Woo-Hoo!

Posted by Anji on Thursday 20th March 2008

Thirteen is an unlucky number for some but not for me! The thirteenth Carnival of Radical Feminists is being hosted right here at Shut Up, Sit Down! :D

If you have a submission for the carnival please click here to send it through the blog carnival submission page.

The deadline for submissions is Friday 13th April (there’s another 13, and a Friday 13th to boot!) and the carnival will be appearing on the full Moon, which will be Friday 20th April.

You can nominate your own post or someone else’s and send as many as you like. I’m really looking forward to reading the submissions and hosting the Carnival!

Posted in carnival | 1 Comment »

Feminism and the Sex Trade

Posted by Anji on Friday 22nd February 2008

I wrote this for the South Coast Feminists blog after talking about the subject in our last meeting, and decided to cross post it here as it’s more personal writing than writing for the organisation. Enjoy.

There was some discussion at the last meeting about pornography and prostitution. This is of course one of the current hotly-debated subjects among women’s rights movements at the moment, and quite honestly I am finding it rather difficult to understand why. If I am really honest and set aside my worries about seeming militant, it boils down to this: I do not believe you are a feminist if you support the sex industry in any way. There, I said it. Now you can either decide not to read the rest because I am obviously a crazy repressed hairy-legged dyke, you can scroll down to the bottom to tell me the same, or you can read what I have to say on the matter. Be warned that I am not going to hold anyone’s hand or be discreet, and you may well find yourself being offended. Sometimes we have to stop worrying about offending people in order to educate them.

Support of Pornography and Prostitution Is Not Feminist

If you are pro-pornography or pro-prostitution, you are not a feminist. The concept behind feminism is equality for women and girls, and the eradication of violence against women. The sex industry in all its forms exists as a tool of violence against women and more than that, a tool to keep women subjugated and ‘in their place’. If you support a system which for the overwhelming majority destroys women and girls, you are not a feminist.

“But there does exist pornography which is pro-woman!”

It exists, but it is not the norm. Never fool yourself that it is the norm. Go into any sex shop and ask where they keep the pro-woman porn. You will be looked at like you grew an extra head. Stop talking in the abstract and look at the reality - it’s easy to hold an academic debate on a subject like this without actually considering the reality. We can sit and talk about what sort of pornography might exist or should exist or sort-of exists if you spend a few hours doing some specific research - but look for a moment at the pornography that ACTUALLY exists. Men do not buy ‘pro-woman’ pornography and it is men who perpetrate violence against women. The existence of so-called ‘pro-woman’ pornography does nothing for the cause as a whole because it is not a part of the industry, it exists only on the fringes and most importantly, it is only watched by people who already ‘get it’. The overwhelming majority of male-dominated society, the ones who benefit daily from their elevated position over women, do not care if pro-woman pornography exists or not, because what they want is to buy women’s bodies. Pornography, no matter who it is made by or how soft- or hard-core it is, allows them to do that, and the widespread and permeating accessibility of pornography allows them to see it as normal and reinforces their sense of entitlement to women’s bodies.

“Prostitution has always happened, it’s just a fact of life!”

So has murder, but that doesn’t mean that anyone is advocating its legalisation. We call it ‘just a job’, ‘the oldest profession’, but how many professions can you think of where an exit strategy is required? How many professions use slavery and trafficking as their main staff suppliers? In how many professions is the average age of entry just fourteen years? Think about it for a minute - 14 years old is the AVERAGE. Now consider how many must be even younger than that to make it the average? In how many professions is assault or murder a real occupational hazard?

“But many women in the sex trade choose to be there. Surely it is antifeminist of me to disapprove of their choice, to tell them they are wrong to do so?”

This has always struck me as a nonargument. I campaign for the end of animal testing - should I stop because a few vivisectionists might lose their jobs? If someone is in an industry which promotes the destruction of other human beings, in which other human beings are systematically and routinely destroyed, and they are there voluntarily, they are one of the very few in the oppressed group who is allowed also to oppress. And women working voluntarily in the sex industry (as prostitutes or working in pornography) are oppressing women, just as much as the men who pay for them. They are a very small minority having an empowering experience on the backs of millions of women who are not there by choice, and the millions of women who are beaten, raped or killed because a culture of pornography has taught society that this is fine. If my opposition to the sex industry offends the few women who are there by choice, why should I sympathise? Given the choice between helping the minority of women remain in the sex industry promoting violence and helping the patriarchy retain its power, or helping the millions of women who are regularly beaten and raped, I know what I will choose. If you would prefer to pander to those few who might lose their jobs as opposed to supporting the many who are injured or dying, you are not a feminist.

All of this is why I say - if you support the sex industry, you are anti-woman. If you support the sex industry, you do not care about equality for women. If you support the sex industry, you support abuse, rape, torture and murder of women. If you support the sex industry, you are not a feminist.

I’m sure I will be accused of being overbearing and draconian by speaking this truth. After all, I am often told, who am I to decide who can call themselves feminists? Of course I don’t have that right, I wouldn’t want it. I don’t much care what people call themselves. I could call myself a kangaroo if I wanted. I could even truly and honestly believe myself to be a kangaroo. That still doesn’t make me an actual kangaroo, any more than calling yourself a feminist while supporting pornography or prostitution makes you an actual feminist.

Some further reading for those who are so inclined.

* Rmott62 - Rebecca is a woman who has escaped prostitution, and speaks about it candidly in her blog. I would particularly recommend her post I Have Had Enough which covers many of the same bases I just did, but from the view of a former prostituted woman.
* Against Pornography
* Anti Porn Resource Centre
* Coalition Against Trafficking In Women
* Feminist Coalition Against Prostitution
* The No-Porn Pledge - for those who have taken the step to eradicate pornography from their own lives.
* Prostitution Research and Education
* Scottish Women Against Pornography
* The Truth Isn’t Sexy
* This Is Playboy

Posted in feminists | 12 Comments »

Weird.

Posted by Anji on Sunday 10th February 2008

Why do people immediately go on the defensive when you mention a lifestyle choice you’ve made which puts you in the minority?

Case one - I’m in a kebab shop at 2am, waiting an age for much needed sustenance. The place is heaving, and a bearded young man is being squeezed up next to me by the crowd. We are making small talk about how busy it is. He asks how long I’ve been waiting and I say I’ve already ordered, and I’ve been waiting five minutes or so for my food. He asks what I ordered and I reply ‘a veggie burger and chips’. He rolls his eyes. “You vegetarian?” I reply yes, and he rolls his eyes again. “Stupid. People need meat.” He asked if I was vegetarian, I gave a simple answer and immediately he felt the need to defend his meat-eating? Is he so insecure, does he feel so guilty about his carnivorous ways that he has to argue for them even when not invited to?

Case two - a woman friend is talking about difficulty with shaving. I say I’m not much help there because I don’t do it. Immediately she begins listing off the reasons why she shaves, defending herself, making excuses - she prefers the way it feels, all the other stuff I hear from every shaving woman I’ve ever met. I didn’t ask. I didn’t tell her she should not shave, or demand to know why she didn’t stop. I simply mentioned that I don’t do it because it was relevant to the conversation. If it’s so normal to do it, why do people immediately start trying to excuse themselves when it’s mentioned, even when they clearly haven’t been called on it?

If people believe they are doing things by choice because it’s best for them, why do they immediately take a defensive stance even when no offensive stance is presented? Is it really so hard to say “Oh right, I do the opposite,” and carry on with the conversation? Do they secretly think/know that eating meat/shaving/insert action here is wrong, and they’re trying to convince themselves? Are they trying to convince me I should do things their way, even though I didn’t ask for the opinion? Are they really just insecure and asking for me to tell them their way’s okay too? Or are they testing me, trying me out as a figurehead, trying to make me respond arrogantly so next time they meet a vegetarian/someone who shaves they can say “ALL vegetarians/hairy people are idiots because I met this one…”

I’m seriously confused by this, and more than a little annoyed.

Posted in body hair, personal, vegetarian | 4 Comments »